Komunikasi Sosial Komunitas Adat Bayan Lombok Utara: Studi Etnografi Model Komunikasi Tradisi Menyilaq

Kadri  Kadri

doi:10.15642/jki.2018.8.2.275-294

Authors

Kadri Kadri UIN Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15642/jki.2018.8.2.275-294

Keywords:

Komunikasi sosial, adat Bayan, tradisi menyilaq, model sosialisasi

Abstract

This paper analyses the social communication model of a menyilaq ritual within the Bayan indigenous people in North Lombok, West Nusa Tenggara (NTB). By using the ethnographic communication approach, this study found that the tradition of menyilaq carried out by Pebenkel to the Bayan indigenous people utilised the patterns of passive top-down and active top-down socialization. The Menyilaq ritual reflected effective communication as there were personal contact and immediate feedback within both top-down socialisation models. Additionally, it became a medium of communication of silaturahim which were considered as a form of respects to maintain family ties and able to build good relations among community members. Further, the tradition has shown its consistency in maintaining the tradition of information delivery amid the onslaught of the current communication technology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alqadrie, S.I. (1999). Konflik Etnik di Ambon dan Sambas: Tinjauan Sosiologis, maklah disampaikan dalam rangka memperingati Jebelium ke 30. Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia.

Andung, P.A. (2010). Komunikasi ritual natoni masyarakat adat Boti dalam di Nusa Tenggara Timur. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 8(1)

Barth, F. (ed.). 1988. Kelompok Etnik dan Batasannya. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press

?ogdan, R., & Taylor., S.J. (1975). Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods, A Phenomenological Approach to the Social Science, Canada: John Willey & Sons. Inc.

Capozza, D., & Rupert, B. (2000). Social Identity Processes, London: SAGE Publications

Cresswell, W.J. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design Choosing Among Five Traditions, California: Sage Publications, Inc.

Denzin, N.K,. & Lincoln., Y.S. (2000). Handook of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications

Effendy, O.U. (2003). Ilmu, Teori, dan Filsafat Komunikasi. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti

Fisher, S. dkk. (2001). Mengelolah Konflik: Keterampilan dan Strategi untuk Bertindak, Indonesia: SMK Grafika Desa Putra

Huberman, A. M., & Miles B. M. (2014). Analisis Data Kualitatif, Penj. Rohendi Rohidi, Jakarta: UI Press.

Ibrahim, A.S. (1992). Panduan Penelitian Etnografi Komunikasi. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional

Widiyatwati, K. (2013). Ritual Kliwonan bagi Masyarakat Batang. Jurnal Humanika, 18(2).

Liliweri, A. (2002). Gatra-Gatra Komunikasi Antarbudaya, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Liliweri, A. 2004. Dasar-Dasar Komunikasi Antarbudaya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Liliweri, A. 1997, Komunikasi Antarpribadi, Bandung: PT. Adiyta Citra Bakti

Marzali, A. (2001). Kekerasan sosial di Kalimantan: Sebuah analisis antropologi sosiokultural. Jurnal Analisis CSIS. 30(30)

Moleong, L.J. (2006). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mulyana, D. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mulyana, D. (2001). Ilmu Komunikasi Suatu Pengantar, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya

Mulyana, D. & Rakhmat. J. (ed.). (2001). Komunikasi Antarbudaya. Bandung: Rosda

Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Lombok Utara. (2010). Kabupaten Lombok Utara Dalam Angka

Ritzer, G., & Goodman, D.J. (2004). Teori Sosiologi Modern, Edisi Keenam, Terjemahan Alimandan, Jakarta: Prenada Media.

Soekanto., & Soeleman. (1983). Hukum Adat Indonesia, Jakarta, CV. Rajawali

Soeprapto, R. (2002). Interaksionisme Simbolik, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Spradley, J.P. (1997). Metode Etnografi. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana

Suparlan. (1984) Pola Interaksi Antaretnik di Pontianak, Pekanbaru dan Sumenep, Jakarta : Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan

Taylor, M.D., & Moghaddam, M.F. (1994). Theories of Intergroup Relations: International Social Psychological Perspective, London: Westport Connecticut.